Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided March 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR262021_03B2203

AwardsMetExhibitionsMetHigh salaryMetJudgingMetMembershipMetPublished materialMetFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A pastry chef established six initial criteria including awards, memberships, publications, judging, and high salary. The AAO dismissed because the final merits analysis found insufficient evidence of sustained national acclaim or status among the very top of the field despite meeting initial evidentiary requirements.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Awards · Certificate of award with certified English translation submitted on appeal.
  • Exhibitions · Artistic display criterion met according to Director determination.
  • High salary · Director determined high salary criterion satisfied.
  • Judging · Judging experience recognized by Director as meeting criterion.
  • Membership · Director acknowledged membership in professional association.
  • Published material · Evidence of published material established by Director.

What was missing

  • Final merits · Met three criteria but failed final merits; single award five years prior, limited media coverage, and judging experience insufficient to show sustained national acclaim or top-tier status.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsMetCertificate of award with certified English translation submitted on appeal.
ExhibitionsMetArtistic display criterion met according to Director determination.
High salaryMetDirector determined high salary criterion satisfied.
JudgingMetJudging experience recognized by Director as meeting criterion.
MembershipMetDirector acknowledged membership in professional association.
Published materialMetEvidence of published material established by Director.
Final meritsNot metMet three criteria but failed final merits; single award five years prior, limited media coverage, and judging experience insufficient to show sustained national acclaim or top-tier status.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.