Outcome: Dismissed
MAR302020_01B2203
Our summary
A venture capital firm managing partner claimed five EB-1A criteria. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met none of them, finding articles not in major media, contributions not of major significance, and scholarship not established. The decision declined final merits review.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Judging · Claimed but decision found criterion not satisfied
- Original contributions · Decision found original contributions but not of major significance in field
- Published material · Articles submitted but record does not establish publication in professional or major media
- Scholarly articles · Article content appeared general commentary rather than scholarship; publication not established
- Final merits · Decision declined to conduct final merits determination; found aggregate record does not support extraordinary ability finding
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Claimed but decision found criterion not satisfied | |
| Not met | Decision found original contributions but not of major significance in field | |
| Not met | Articles submitted but record does not establish publication in professional or major media | |
| Not met | Article content appeared general commentary rather than scholarship; publication not established | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or discussed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or discussed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or discussed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or discussed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or discussed | |
| Not met | Decision declined to conduct final merits determination; found aggregate record does not support extraordinary ability finding |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
