Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFinance and economicsIndividualDecided March 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR302020_01B2203

JudgingNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metScholarly articlesNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A venture capital firm managing partner claimed five EB-1A criteria. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met none of them, finding articles not in major media, contributions not of major significance, and scholarship not established. The decision declined final merits review.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Judging · Claimed but decision found criterion not satisfied
  • Original contributions · Decision found original contributions but not of major significance in field
  • Published material · Articles submitted but record does not establish publication in professional or major media
  • Scholarly articles · Article content appeared general commentary rather than scholarship; publication not established
  • Final merits · Decision declined to conduct final merits determination; found aggregate record does not support extraordinary ability finding

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingNot metClaimed but decision found criterion not satisfied
Original contributionsNot metDecision found original contributions but not of major significance in field
Published materialNot metArticles submitted but record does not establish publication in professional or major media
Scholarly articlesNot metArticle content appeared general commentary rather than scholarship; publication not established
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or discussed
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or discussed
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or discussed
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or discussed
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or discussed
Final meritsNot metDecision declined to conduct final merits determination; found aggregate record does not support extraordinary ability finding

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.