Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided May 2023Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAY012023_03B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A lawyer seeking EB-2 national interest waiver to continue legal practice. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks substantial national importance under Dhanasar because it would not impact the field or economy broadly, create significant jobs, or show prospective economic effects beyond her future employer.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor of legal work lacks prospective impact beyond employer and clients; no evidence of national importance or substantial economic benefit.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metProposed endeavor of legal work lacks prospective impact beyond employer and clients; no evidence of national importance or substantial economic benefit.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failure dispositive; second prong not analyzed.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failure dispositive; third prong not analyzed.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.