Outcome: Dismissed
MAY052025_02B2203
Our summary
A general manager and entrepreneur in China's building materials industry seeking EB-1A classification claimed four criteria but met only two. The AAO found his awards lacked national or international recognition and his contributions, while claimed, were not proven to be original and majorly significant.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Service center found petitioner performed lead or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations
- Published material · Service center found published material about petitioner in professional or major trade publications
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner failed to establish awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence
- Original contributions · Petitioner failed to establish that business models, industry standards, or patents were original and majorly significant
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Service center found petitioner performed lead or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations | |
| Met | Service center found published material about petitioner in professional or major trade publications | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to establish awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to establish that business models, industry standards, or patents were original and majorly significant |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
