EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided May 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
MAY052025_03B2203
AwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
Cosmetics innovator claimed EB-1A extraordinary ability for stamp crease tool invention and artistic displays. AAO affirmed denial, finding no recognized awards, insufficient evidence of original contribution, and failure to establish three criteria. Lack of sustained national or international acclaim found.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No evidence of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes
- Original contributions · Stamp crease tool lacks corroboration, patent, or demonstrated major significance
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | No evidence of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes |
 Original contributions | Not met | Stamp crease tool lacks corroboration, patent, or demonstrated major significance |
 Exhibitions | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in detail regarding artistic display criterion |
 Leading or critical role | Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but decision focused on other criteria |
 Final merits | Not reached / not discussed | Threshold criteria not met; final merits determination reserved |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.