Outcome: Dismissed
MAY072025_04B5203
Our summary
A telecommunications engineer seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver claimed his endeavor would involve the BEAD broadband program. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and detail about what activities he actually intended to undertake, making it impossible to assess national importance.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor too vague and ill-defined; insufficient specificity regarding activities within BEAD program; working in important field without showing prospective impact is insufficient.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Proposed endeavor too vague and ill-defined; insufficient specificity regarding activities within BEAD program; working in important field without showing prospective impact is insufficient. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong failed; petitioner did not articulate what endeavor entails or how to accomplish it. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong failed; cannot determine benefit to United States without clear endeavor definition. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
