Outcome: Dismissed
MAY102024_01B2203
Our summary
Process engineering manager appealing dismissal of motion to reopen and reconsider EB-1A petition. AAO held motion properly dismissed because evidence submitted post-petition filing and lacked specificity regarding contributions of major significance; petitioner did not overcome basis for prior denial.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner met this criterion; not contested on appeal.
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner abandoned claim on appeal; not pursued in motions or appeal.
- Judging · Petitioner abandoned claim on appeal; not pursued in motions or appeal.
- Membership · Petitioner abandoned claim on appeal; not pursued in motions or appeal.
- Original contributions · Evidence submitted on motion lacked specificity; letters used hyperbolic language without explaining field influence.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner met this criterion; not contested on appeal. | |
| Not met | Petitioner abandoned claim on appeal; not pursued in motions or appeal. | |
| Not met | Petitioner abandoned claim on appeal; not pursued in motions or appeal. | |
| Not met | Petitioner abandoned claim on appeal; not pursued in motions or appeal. | |
| Not met | Evidence submitted on motion lacked specificity; letters used hyperbolic language without explaining field influence. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Motion dismissed; merits of underlying petition not addressed per decision. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
