Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided May 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAY132024_01B2203

Published materialMetAwardsNot metJudgingNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A mountain climber and scout self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he met only one of the ten evidentiary criteria (published materials) but not the required three minimum. Overall record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or elite recognition.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Published material · Director and AAO agreed petitioner satisfied published materials criterion

What was missing

  • Awards · No major internationally recognized award established
  • Judging · No documentary evidence of actual judging participation in same or allied field; invitation alone insufficient
  • Membership · Memberships in Boy Scouts, Nepal Mountaineering Association, and others lack documented exclusive achievement-based requirements
  • Original contributions · Claimed but not sufficiently substantiated in record
  • Final merits · Evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Published materialMetDirector and AAO agreed petitioner satisfied published materials criterion
AwardsNot metNo major internationally recognized award established
JudgingNot metNo documentary evidence of actual judging participation in same or allied field; invitation alone insufficient
MembershipNot metMemberships in Boy Scouts, Nepal Mountaineering Association, and others lack documented exclusive achievement-based requirements
Original contributionsNot metClaimed but not sufficiently substantiated in record
Final meritsNot metEvidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.