Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIIndividualDecided May 2025Remanded

Outcome: Remanded

MAY132025_05B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A petitioner sought NIW EB-2 classification but the service center denied it without adequately analyzing the evidence. The AAO remanded, finding the service center did not properly discuss the petitioner's detailed endeavor description, did not evaluate factors in totality for the second prong, and did not adequately weigh considerations for the third prong.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedService center did not adequately analyze evidence; AAO found insufficient analysis requires remand
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedService center relied on inadequate endeavor description; AAO found factors analyzed individually rather than in totality; remand required
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedService center did not adequately discuss evidence or explain balancing of relevant considerations; remand required

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.