Outcome: Dismissed
MAY142024_03B5203
Our summary
A hairstylist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal because petitioner failed to meet the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability requirements, satisfying only two of six regulatory criteria. National interest waiver analysis was not reached.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not reached / not discussed | Claimed but not analyzed; petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification, making NIW analysis unnecessary. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Claimed but not analyzed; petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification, making NIW analysis unnecessary. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Claimed but not analyzed; petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification, making NIW analysis unnecessary. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
