An art history professor and researcher claimed extraordinary ability through peer review, publications, and scholarly contributions. The AAO found she met three initial criteria but concluded she lacked sustained national or international acclaim and did not rank among the very top in her field, ultimately denying the petition.

Vocational agricultural teacher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Initial petition denied for failing to meet three of ten criteria; appeal dismissed. Motion to reopen and reconsider sought reconsideration without identifying legal error and submitted job offer dated after petition filing, which cannot establish eligibility retroactively. Motion dismissed.

Construction manager and civil engineer sought EB-2 NIW. AAO dismissed the fifth motion to reopen and reconsider on procedural grounds: petitioner failed to establish new facts warranting reopening or show erroneous law or policy application. Merits were not addressed.

HVAC and electrical professional seeking EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal of motion to reopen and reconsider because petitioner failed to submit new facts supported by affidavits and documentary evidence, and motion to reconsider lacked citations to law or showing decision was incorrect.