Outcome: Dismissed
MAY222014_01D8101
Our summary
Marketing manager petitioned by employer for O-1A extraordinary ability in business. Petitioner claimed two regulatory criteria and comparable evidence under letters of recommendation. AAO held petitioner met only two criteria but required three; comparable evidence unavailable because petitioner failed to show criteria do not readily apply to occupation.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- High salary · Criterion B(8) established by director and affirmed on appeal
- Leading or critical role · Criterion B(7) established by director and affirmed on appeal
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Criterion B(8) established by director and affirmed on appeal | |
| Met | Criterion B(7) established by director and affirmed on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed by petitioner | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed by petitioner | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed by petitioner | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed by petitioner | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed by petitioner | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not claimed or analyzed by petitioner |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
