EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIIndividualDecided May 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
MAY222025_03B5203
Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
A research scientist self-petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver based on her proposed machine learning and single-cell RNA research. The AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond the importance of the field itself. The record provided only generalized information and publication citations unrelated to the specific endeavor's broader impact.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor lacks specific national importance; generalized benefit to industry insufficient
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Not met | Proposed endeavor lacks specific national importance; generalized benefit to industry insufficient |
 Well positioned | Not reached / not discussed | Not analyzed; first prong failed making analysis unnecessary |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not reached / not discussed | Not analyzed; first prong failed making analysis unnecessary |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.