Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringEmployerDecided May 2025Remanded

Outcome: Remanded

MAY282025_05B5203

Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A civil engineer with a master's degree in civil engineering sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO agreed he qualified as an advanced degree professional but remanded the case because SCOPS made contradictory statements on national importance and provided no analysis for the well-positioned prong, denying him fair notice.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot reached / not discussedSCOPS made contradictory statements; unclear whether criterion was found met or not met
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedSCOPS concluded petitioner did not meet this prong but provided no analysis or explanation of findings
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached; case remanded due to insufficient analysis of first two prongs

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.