Outcome: Remanded
MAY282025_05B5203
Our summary
A civil engineer with a master's degree in civil engineering sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO agreed he qualified as an advanced degree professional but remanded the case because SCOPS made contradictory statements on national importance and provided no analysis for the well-positioned prong, denying him fair notice.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not reached / not discussed | SCOPS made contradictory statements; unclear whether criterion was found met or not met | |
| Not reached / not discussed | SCOPS concluded petitioner did not meet this prong but provided no analysis or explanation of findings | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached; case remanded due to insufficient analysis of first two prongs |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
