Outcome: Dismissed
Mar172009_01B2203
Our summary
A dancer and choreographer sought extraordinary ability classification. She claimed three criteria: awards, membership, and published materials. The AAO found none met: youth awards do not show top-field status, association membership criteria unproven, and materials lacked major media publication. Overall evidence showed talent but insufficient sustained acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Youth awards and novice category awards cannot demonstrate top-of-field status; significance not established
- Membership · Association failed to demonstrate that membership requires outstanding achievements as essential condition
- Published material · No articles appeared in major media; publication sources and dates not clearly documented
- Final merits · Evidence shows talent and youth success but does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Youth awards and novice category awards cannot demonstrate top-of-field status; significance not established | |
| Not met | Association failed to demonstrate that membership requires outstanding achievements as essential condition | |
| Not met | No articles appeared in major media; publication sources and dates not clearly documented | |
| Not met | Evidence shows talent and youth success but does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
