Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided 2009Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

Mar172009_01B2203

AwardsNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A dancer and choreographer sought extraordinary ability classification. She claimed three criteria: awards, membership, and published materials. The AAO found none met: youth awards do not show top-field status, association membership criteria unproven, and materials lacked major media publication. Overall evidence showed talent but insufficient sustained acclaim.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Youth awards and novice category awards cannot demonstrate top-of-field status; significance not established
  • Membership · Association failed to demonstrate that membership requires outstanding achievements as essential condition
  • Published material · No articles appeared in major media; publication sources and dates not clearly documented
  • Final merits · Evidence shows talent and youth success but does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top level

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metYouth awards and novice category awards cannot demonstrate top-of-field status; significance not established
MembershipNot metAssociation failed to demonstrate that membership requires outstanding achievements as essential condition
Published materialNot metNo articles appeared in major media; publication sources and dates not clearly documented
Final meritsNot metEvidence shows talent and youth success but does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top level

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.