EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided 2009Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Mar192009_05B2203
AwardsNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
A martial artist claimed EB-1A extraordinary ability in athletics based on age-group wushu competition wins and Dan rank advancement. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the awards lacked national or international recognition and the evidence did not establish sustained acclaim at the very top of the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Age-group competition awards and Dan ranking do not constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence.
- Final merits · Evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at top level of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | Age-group competition awards and Dan ranking do not constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence. |
 Final merits | Not met | Evidence does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at top level of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.