Outcome: Dismissed
May092012_02B2203
Our summary
Petitioner claimed three criteria: awards, membership, and published material. AAO found none met the plain language requirements: scholarship not recognized prize, association membership not based on outstanding achievement, published material missing required attribution. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Scholarship did not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prize for excellence
- Membership · Association membership criteria do not require outstanding achievements; insufficient for criterion
- Published material · Evidence lacked required date and author; did not meet plain language requirements
- Final merits · Did not establish sustained national or international acclaim; no extraordinary ability shown
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Scholarship did not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prize for excellence | |
| Not met | Association membership criteria do not require outstanding achievements; insufficient for criterion | |
| Not met | Evidence lacked required date and author; did not meet plain language requirements | |
| Not met | Did not establish sustained national or international acclaim; no extraordinary ability shown |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
