Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided 2012Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

May142012_06B2203

AwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Self-petitioner claimed extraordinary ability and cited selection as one of Directors of Creation as major achievement. The AAO found this selection did not constitute a major, internationally recognized award and petitioner failed to meet three required evidentiary criteria under awards, published material, and original contributions. Appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Selection as one of Directors of Creation not shown to be major, internationally recognized award meeting regulatory standard.
  • Original contributions · Petitioner did not demonstrate original contributions of major significance in field meeting regulatory requirement.
  • Published material · Petitioner did not establish eligibility for published material about alien criterion; insufficient evidence submitted.
  • Final merits · Petitioner failed to submit one major award or three qualifying evidentiary categories; not shown to be in small percentage at top of field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metSelection as one of Directors of Creation not shown to be major, internationally recognized award meeting regulatory standard.
Original contributionsNot metPetitioner did not demonstrate original contributions of major significance in field meeting regulatory requirement.
Published materialNot metPetitioner did not establish eligibility for published material about alien criterion; insufficient evidence submitted.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner failed to submit one major award or three qualifying evidentiary categories; not shown to be in small percentage at top of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.