Outcome: Dismissed
NOV072005_08B2203
Our summary
Self-represented chef claiming extraordinary ability through Chinese cuisine awards, association membership, publication, judging participation and food exhibitions. AAO found awards unverified, membership routine, article improperly translated, judging invitation unsubstantiated, and venues for displays unidentified, failing to show sustained top-tier acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Award certificates lack evidence of official comprehensive competition results or significant national or international stature
- Exhibitions · Specific venues where culinary creations displayed not identified; arranging display alone does not satisfy criterion
- Judging · Invitation to judge event is not equivalent to participation evaluating professional culinary artists at national level
- Membership · Association membership based on employment or activity, not outstanding achievement as essential condition
- Published material · Article partial translation lacks date and author identification; no sustained acclaim in national media
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of culinary field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Award certificates lack evidence of official comprehensive competition results or significant national or international stature | |
| Not met | Specific venues where culinary creations displayed not identified; arranging display alone does not satisfy criterion | |
| Not met | Invitation to judge event is not equivalent to participation evaluating professional culinary artists at national level | |
| Not met | Association membership based on employment or activity, not outstanding achievement as essential condition | |
| Not met | Article partial translation lacks date and author identification; no sustained acclaim in national media | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of culinary field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
