A petitioner claiming exceptional ability for security management proposed a waiver. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the EB-2 exceptional ability classification (not meeting three of six regulatory criteria) and provided inconsistent, insufficient evidence regarding the specific proposed endeavor required for national interest waiver analysis.

Entrepreneur claiming exceptional ability and national interest waiver presented inconsistent evidence about occupational field and job duties. AAO held petitioner failed to establish consistent occupational definition, met only one of six exceptional ability criteria, and thus lacked EB-2 eligibility, making waiver analysis unnecessary.

Dentist seeking NIW for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish EB-2 qualification; satisfied only one of six required regulatory criteria for exceptional ability and waived appeal on remaining criteria issues.

Architect sought NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification for proposed architectural and design projects. AAO held petitioner failed to establish specific consistent proposed endeavor and did not demonstrate national importance beyond general field significance, thus failing Dhanasar first prong.