EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIIndividualDecided November 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
NOV132025_03B5203
Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
A researcher in wireless charging technology for smartphones sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established substantial merit and was well-positioned to advance the endeavor, but failed to demonstrate national importance. Letters lacked corroboration and specific evidence of broader impact on industry, economy, or national security.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor lacks sufficient evidence of national importance; benefits limited to employer, licensees and customers without broader industry or economic impact.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Not met | Proposed endeavor lacks sufficient evidence of national importance; benefits limited to employer, licensees and customers without broader industry or economic impact. |
 Well positioned | Not reached / not discussed | Decision reserves analysis because first prong failed; no meaningful purpose to address remaining prongs. |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not reached / not discussed | Decision reserves analysis because first prong failed; no meaningful purpose to address remaining prongs. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.