Outcome: Dismissed
NOV162005_23B2203
Our summary
Self-represented musical drama performer claimed extraordinary ability under membership, high salary, and commercial success criteria. AAO found no criterion satisfied: membership criterion inappropriate for performing artists, no comparative salary evidence, and photographs do not demonstrate commercial success.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Commercial success · Photographs of performances insufficient; criterion requires sales or receipts evidence
- High salary · No comparative evidence showing compensation significantly high relative to other performing artists
- Membership · No evidence association requires outstanding achievement; criterion more suited to visual artists
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to meet three criteria; no evidence of sustained acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Photographs of performances insufficient; criterion requires sales or receipts evidence | |
| Not met | No comparative evidence showing compensation significantly high relative to other performing artists | |
| Not met | No evidence association requires outstanding achievement; criterion more suited to visual artists | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to meet three criteria; no evidence of sustained acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
