Outcome: Dismissed
NOV162005_27B2203
Our summary
Fashion designer filed self-petition for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed awards, membership, judging, and exhibitions criteria. AAO found petitioner failed to meet three required criteria; supporting letters from industry associations were inadequate to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Prize lacked documentation from awarding entity or print media establishing significant national or international stature.
- Exhibitions · Designs not demonstrated as displayed at significant national venues or regular participation in exclusive venue exhibitions.
- Judging · No evidence of judging activities at national or international level evaluating professional designers.
- Membership · Membership evaluated at local or regional level; does not require outstanding achievement as essential condition.
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place within small percentage at very top of fashion field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Prize lacked documentation from awarding entity or print media establishing significant national or international stature. | |
| Not met | Designs not demonstrated as displayed at significant national venues or regular participation in exclusive venue exhibitions. | |
| Not met | No evidence of judging activities at national or international level evaluating professional designers. | |
| Not met | Membership evaluated at local or regional level; does not require outstanding achievement as essential condition. | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place within small percentage at very top of fashion field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
