EB-2 NIWData science and analyticsIndividualDecided November 2024Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
NOV182024_09B5203
Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
A biostatistician sought EB-2 classification with NIW. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but failed to demonstrate national importance of the proposed endeavor. The testimony addressed field importance, not the specific endeavor's prospective impact.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Proposed endeavor lacked probative evidence of national importance; no independent objective evidence from funders or partners
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Not met | Proposed endeavor lacked probative evidence of national importance; no independent objective evidence from funders or partners |
 Well positioned | Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; second prong not reached per Bagamasbad doctrine |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; third prong not reached per Bagamasbad doctrine |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.