Outcome: Dismissed
NOV242021_01B2203
Our summary
A painter from Russia claimed extraordinary ability through six evidentiary criteria. The AAO affirmed that he met judging and exhibition criteria but rejected awards and published material claims. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence of national or international acclaim or top-tier status.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Director found criterion satisfied regarding artistic display; AAO concurred
- Judging · Director found criterion satisfied; AAO concurred
What was missing
- Awards · Certificates, diploma, and gold medal lack evidence of national or international recognition
- Published material · Failed to submit all required elements under regulatory criteria
- Final merits · Did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found criterion satisfied regarding artistic display; AAO concurred | |
| Met | Director found criterion satisfied; AAO concurred | |
| Not met | Certificates, diploma, and gold medal lack evidence of national or international recognition | |
| Not met | Failed to submit all required elements under regulatory criteria | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed on appeal but not fully analyzed as separate basis | |
| Not met | Did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
