Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided November 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

NOV242021_01B2203

ExhibitionsMetJudgingMetAwardsNot metPublished materialNot metOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A painter from Russia claimed extraordinary ability through six evidentiary criteria. The AAO affirmed that he met judging and exhibition criteria but rejected awards and published material claims. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence of national or international acclaim or top-tier status.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Director found criterion satisfied regarding artistic display; AAO concurred
  • Judging · Director found criterion satisfied; AAO concurred

What was missing

  • Awards · Certificates, diploma, and gold medal lack evidence of national or international recognition
  • Published material · Failed to submit all required elements under regulatory criteria
  • Final merits · Did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetDirector found criterion satisfied regarding artistic display; AAO concurred
JudgingMetDirector found criterion satisfied; AAO concurred
AwardsNot metCertificates, diploma, and gold medal lack evidence of national or international recognition
Published materialNot metFailed to submit all required elements under regulatory criteria
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed on appeal but not fully analyzed as separate basis
Final meritsNot metDid not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.