Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AOtherEmployerDecided November 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

NOV252024_03B2203

JudgingClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Weapons development specialist from Ukraine sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met at least three criteria but failed final merits determination, showing only government-level recognition without demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Final merits · Government employment awards did not translate to national or international acclaim; internal honors alone insufficient to show top-percentage standing.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; recent judging instances did not establish sustained national or international acclaim.
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed as basis for extraordinary ability finding.
Final meritsNot metGovernment employment awards did not translate to national or international acclaim; internal honors alone insufficient to show top-percentage standing.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.