Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIIndividualDecided November 2022Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

NOV302022_01B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A computer scientist and instructor sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but failed the first Dhanasar prong because she did not present a specific proposed endeavor and her teaching activities lacked broader field impact.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Petitioner did not specify a proposed endeavor; teaching activities would only impact students, not field broadly

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metPetitioner did not specify a proposed endeavor; teaching activities would only impact students, not field broadly
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; remaining prongs not analyzed under Dhanasar
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedFirst prong failed; remaining prongs not analyzed under Dhanasar

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.