Outcome: Sustained
NOV302023_02B2203
Our summary
A big data center consultant sought extraordinary ability classification in business. He met three initial evidentiary criteria and demonstrated sustained national recognition as an expert, including leadership of technology standards groups. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding he is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Director found evidence of participation as judge of work of others
- Leading or critical role · Director found evidence of leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
- Scholarly articles · Director found evidence of authorship of scholarly articles in field
- Final merits · AAO found sustained national or international acclaim and small percentage at top of field
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found evidence of participation as judge of work of others | |
| Met | Director found evidence of leading or critical role for distinguished organizations | |
| Met | Director found evidence of authorship of scholarly articles in field | |
| Met | AAO found sustained national or international acclaim and small percentage at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
