Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AData science and analyticsIndividualDecided 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

OCT012025_01B2203

AwardsNot metHigh salaryNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metJudgingClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

Data scientist claimed five criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. SCOPS and AAO found only one criterion met (high salary), then withdrew it on appeal. AAO determined petitioner failed to meet three required criteria and dismissed without final merits analysis.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · No major or lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards shown
  • High salary · Did not establish salary high relative to others in field
  • Leading or critical role · Did not establish leading or critical role for organization with distinguished reputation
  • Membership · Did not establish membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement
  • Original contributions · Did not establish major significance in field of data science

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metNo major or lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards shown
High salaryNot metDid not establish salary high relative to others in field
Leading or critical roleNot metDid not establish leading or critical role for organization with distinguished reputation
MembershipNot metDid not establish membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement
Original contributionsNot metDid not establish major significance in field of data science
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not separately analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.