Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided October 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

OCT112024_01B2203

ExhibitionsMetAwardsClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A dancer and choreographer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification claiming seven criteria. The AAO found the petitioner met the exhibitions criterion but failed to establish three of ten required criteria. Without meeting the threshold evidence requirement, the AAO dismissed the appeal without reaching a final merits determination.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Petitioner met criterion for displaying work at artistic exhibition

What was missing

  • Final merits · Only one criterion met; three required; no sustained national or international acclaim

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetPetitioner met criterion for displaying work at artistic exhibition
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; decision reserved this issue
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no substantive discussion
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; decision reserved this issue
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no substantive discussion
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no substantive discussion
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no substantive discussion
Final meritsNot metOnly one criterion met; three required; no sustained national or international acclaim

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.