Outcome: Dismissed
OCT122018_01D8101
Our summary
Summary is being reviewed; the table above reflects the decision record.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Beneficiary judged dance competitions for recognized organization.
What was missing
- Awards · Awards from age-limited, amateur, and rising-star competitions do not demonstrate nationally or internationally recognized prizes.
- Leading or critical role · Dance studio status not established at distinguished competitive level compared to other studios.
- Published material · Media coverage does not establish publication in major media about beneficiary's specific achievements.
- Final merits · Cumulative evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Beneficiary judged dance competitions for recognized organization. | |
| Not met | Awards from age-limited, amateur, and rising-star competitions do not demonstrate nationally or internationally recognized prizes. | |
| Not met | Dance studio status not established at distinguished competitive level compared to other studios. | |
| Not met | Media coverage does not establish publication in major media about beneficiary's specific achievements. | |
| Not met | Cumulative evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
