Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided October 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

OCT142025_05B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Lawyer proposing consulting firm providing legal advice on digital asset financial safeguarding. Claimed national importance through government policy alignment and industry support. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance: services already provided by others, no broader implications, no significant U.S. employment potential.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Proposed legal consulting services on digital assets lack national or global implications and no broader impact demonstrated.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metProposed legal consulting services on digital assets lack national or global implications and no broader impact demonstrated.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedDispositive failure on first prong means second prong not analyzed.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedDispositive failure on first prong means third prong not analyzed.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.