Outcome: Dismissed
OCT152020_04B2203
Our summary
Event management professional claimed five criteria on appeal after Director found only one met. AAO rejected membership and published material; found petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim or position among top of field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Director and AAO found criterion met; not further analyzed on appeal
What was missing
- Membership · SMA, WISE, WAOFP memberships not shown to require outstanding achievements judged by experts
- Published material · Magazine article had circulation only 5,000 copies and not major professional publication or medium
- Final merits · Petitioner has not garnered national or international acclaim and does not rank among small percentage at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director and AAO found criterion met; not further analyzed on appeal | |
| Not met | SMA, WISE, WAOFP memberships not shown to require outstanding achievements judged by experts | |
| Not met | Magazine article had circulation only 5,000 copies and not major professional publication or medium | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; Petitioner did not contest Director findings on this criterion on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; Petitioner did not contest Director findings on this criterion on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; Petitioner did not contest Director findings on this criterion on appeal | |
| Not met | Petitioner has not garnered national or international acclaim and does not rank among small percentage at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
