Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided October 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

OCT162024_01B2203

AwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to identify which of the ten regulatory criteria she claimed to meet or how her evidence related to each criterion, making substantive analysis impossible.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner failed to identify which regulatory criteria she claimed to meet; no substantive analysis performed
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; petitioner did not identify criteria
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedFirst step criteria not met; final merits determination not reached

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.