A financial and investment analyst entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification by meeting the initial evidence threshold, making Dhanasar analysis unnecessary.

Physician and obstetrics-gynecology professor sought EB-2 NIW for academic research and teaching at U.S. university. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed teaching activities lacked national importance despite substantial merit; research showed potential impact but teaching was limited to students and employer, not field-broad implications required by Dhanasar.

Dental assistant and entrepreneur with Brazilian dental degree sought EB-2 NIW. Claimed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance. AAO found neither prong met: endeavor too vague and lacking data on economic impact, job creation, or field advancement. Appeal dismissed.

A financial manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW classification. Director and AAO agreed substantial merit was established but national importance was not. Petitioner claimed her Brazil-focused financial business would create economic bridges, but lacked independent corroborating evidence; field importance alone was insufficient.