Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided September 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

SEP052024_01B2203

Published materialMetAwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metJudgingClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Digital artist in surrealist photomontage sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found one criterion met and one newly met on appeal but concluded the overall record failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status required for the classification.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Published material · Articles about petitioner's work published in qualifying professional online media.

What was missing

  • Awards · Honoree selection did not constitute a prize or award; not nationally or internationally recognized.
  • Original contributions · No evidence of original contributions of major significance in surrealist photomontage field.
  • Final merits · Overall record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status in field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Published materialMetArticles about petitioner's work published in qualifying professional online media.
AwardsNot metHonoree selection did not constitute a prize or award; not nationally or internationally recognized.
Original contributionsNot metNo evidence of original contributions of major significance in surrealist photomontage field.
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not appealed; waived as issue not raised on appeal.
Final meritsNot metOverall record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status in field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.