Outcome: Dismissed
SEP052024_01B2203
Our summary
Digital artist in surrealist photomontage sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found one criterion met and one newly met on appeal but concluded the overall record failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier status required for the classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Published material · Articles about petitioner's work published in qualifying professional online media.
What was missing
- Awards · Honoree selection did not constitute a prize or award; not nationally or internationally recognized.
- Original contributions · No evidence of original contributions of major significance in surrealist photomontage field.
- Final merits · Overall record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status in field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Articles about petitioner's work published in qualifying professional online media. | |
| Not met | Honoree selection did not constitute a prize or award; not nationally or internationally recognized. | |
| Not met | No evidence of original contributions of major significance in surrealist photomontage field. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not appealed; waived as issue not raised on appeal. | |
| Not met | Overall record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status in field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
