Outcome: Dismissed
SEP082020_01D8101
Our summary
Badminton coach employed by training center sought O-1A classification. Petitioner claimed extraordinary ability in athletics via membership and published material criteria. AAO found membership requirements did not mandate outstanding achievements and publications were not about the beneficiary.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Membership · Membership in PBSI and USAB based on employment and certification; not shown to require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts.
- Published material · Published materials cited were about badminton generally, not specifically about beneficiary's work as coach.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Membership in PBSI and USAB based on employment and certification; not shown to require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts. | |
| Not met | Published materials cited were about badminton generally, not specifically about beneficiary's work as coach. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
