Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AComputer science and AIIndividualDecided September 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

SEP082025_02B2203

JudgingMetPublished materialMetScholarly articlesMetAwardsClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A computer scientist and AI company co-founder/CTO sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. He met three initial criteria (published material, judging, scholarly articles). However, final merits analysis found his achievements did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top in his field. Appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · SCOPS determination that criterion was met; AAO did not disturb this finding
  • Published material · Articles about petitioner in professional media with sufficient reach established through Similarweb data
  • Scholarly articles · SCOPS determination that criterion was met; AAO did not disturb this finding

What was missing

  • Final merits · Although initial evidence requirement met, totality of evidence does not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetSCOPS determination that criterion was met; AAO did not disturb this finding
Published materialMetArticles about petitioner in professional media with sufficient reach established through Similarweb data
Scholarly articlesMetSCOPS determination that criterion was met; AAO did not disturb this finding
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed initially but not analyzed in detail on appeal
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed initially but not analyzed as separate basis after three criteria met
Final meritsNot metAlthough initial evidence requirement met, totality of evidence does not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.