Outcome: Dismissed
SEP082025_02B2203
Our summary
A computer scientist and AI company co-founder/CTO sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. He met three initial criteria (published material, judging, scholarly articles). However, final merits analysis found his achievements did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top in his field. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · SCOPS determination that criterion was met; AAO did not disturb this finding
- Published material · Articles about petitioner in professional media with sufficient reach established through Similarweb data
- Scholarly articles · SCOPS determination that criterion was met; AAO did not disturb this finding
What was missing
- Final merits · Although initial evidence requirement met, totality of evidence does not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | SCOPS determination that criterion was met; AAO did not disturb this finding | |
| Met | Articles about petitioner in professional media with sufficient reach established through Similarweb data | |
| Met | SCOPS determination that criterion was met; AAO did not disturb this finding | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but not analyzed in detail on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but not analyzed as separate basis after three criteria met | |
| Not met | Although initial evidence requirement met, totality of evidence does not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field status |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
