Outcome: Dismissed
SEP102021_01B5203
Our summary
A professional with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2. The petitioner's motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed because insufficient new evidence was presented. The AAO affirmed that letters of support and industry evidence did not establish the specific proposed endeavor had national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; vague letters and general industry evidence insufficient without specific prospective impact analysis on broader field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; vague letters and general industry evidence insufficient without specific prospective impact analysis on broader field. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; second prong not reached. | |
| Not reached / not discussed | First prong failed; third prong not reached. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
