Outcome: Dismissed
SEP122024_02B2203
Our summary
Business development executive sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed four criteria; director found only judging satisfied. AAO affirmed that published book was not scholarly article, original contributions lacked major significance in field, and evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Director determined petitioner fulfilled this criterion
What was missing
- Original contributions · Work did not affect field beyond employer, clients, customers at requisite level
- Published material · Book coauthored does not qualify as scholarly article in professional publications
- Scholarly articles · Book is not article; does not appear in professional major trade publications
- Final merits · Record does not establish petitioner among upper echelon with sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director determined petitioner fulfilled this criterion | |
| Not met | Work did not affect field beyond employer, clients, customers at requisite level | |
| Not met | Book coauthored does not qualify as scholarly article in professional publications | |
| Not met | Book is not article; does not appear in professional major trade publications | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Not met | Record does not establish petitioner among upper echelon with sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
