Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided September 2022Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

SEP132022_01B2203

JudgingMetAwardsNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A television host sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming seven criteria on appeal. The Director had accepted only judging. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding awards, published material and original contributions unproven, leaving the petitioner short of three criteria, and noting that sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing were not shown.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Director found the judging criterion satisfied and the appeal decision did not disturb that finding.

What was missing

  • Awards · Awards not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized, and show awards did not identify him as recipient.
  • Original contributions · Popularity, followers and endorsement deals did not show original contributions of major significance in the field.
  • Published material · Publications not shown to be major media; circulation statistics lacked established significance.
  • Final merits · Record did not show sustained acclaim or being among the small percentage at the top.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetDirector found the judging criterion satisfied and the appeal decision did not disturb that finding.
AwardsNot metAwards not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized, and show awards did not identify him as recipient.
Original contributionsNot metPopularity, followers and endorsement deals did not show original contributions of major significance in the field.
Published materialNot metPublications not shown to be major media; circulation statistics lacked established significance.
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed to a conclusion; the decision cites declining to reach remaining issues.
Final meritsNot metRecord did not show sustained acclaim or being among the small percentage at the top.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.