Outcome: Dismissed
SEP132022_01B2203
Our summary
A television host sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming seven criteria on appeal. The Director had accepted only judging. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding awards, published material and original contributions unproven, leaving the petitioner short of three criteria, and noting that sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing were not shown.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Director found the judging criterion satisfied and the appeal decision did not disturb that finding.
What was missing
- Awards · Awards not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized, and show awards did not identify him as recipient.
- Original contributions · Popularity, followers and endorsement deals did not show original contributions of major significance in the field.
- Published material · Publications not shown to be major media; circulation statistics lacked established significance.
- Final merits · Record did not show sustained acclaim or being among the small percentage at the top.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found the judging criterion satisfied and the appeal decision did not disturb that finding. | |
| Not met | Awards not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized, and show awards did not identify him as recipient. | |
| Not met | Popularity, followers and endorsement deals did not show original contributions of major significance in the field. | |
| Not met | Publications not shown to be major media; circulation statistics lacked established significance. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed to a conclusion; the decision cites declining to reach remaining issues. | |
| Not met | Record did not show sustained acclaim or being among the small percentage at the top. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
