EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineIndividualDecided September 2024Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
SEP202024_03B5203
Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
Doctoral research scientist in chemistry sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for research in cancer treatment and heavy metal recovery. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to delineate specific proposed future endeavor; generalized claims about contributions without detailed expert letters or government entity corroboration regarding prospective national impact were insufficient.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Doctoral research scientist failed to delineate specific proposed endeavor; multiple research projects mentioned without clear future focus or prospective impact evidence.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Not met | Doctoral research scientist failed to delineate specific proposed endeavor; multiple research projects mentioned without clear future focus or prospective impact evidence. |
 Well positioned | Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong failed; petitioner abandoned challenge on this issue and decision declined to address remaining Dhanasar prongs. |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong failed; decision declined to address remaining Dhanasar prongs. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.