AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
5 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1AArts, design, architectureNov 2023Dismissed
A restaurant employer sponsored an executive chef with 14 years of experience and United Kingdom culinary training for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the beneficiary met only one of ten evidentiary criteria and the record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability status.
1 of 4 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsMay 2023Dismissed
Fitness company petitioned for bodybuilder beneficiary as O-1A extraordinary ability. Director denied on contract sufficiency and failure to meet three of eight criteria. AAO dismissed appeal, finding serious errors and discrepancies in employment contract, including two contracts for same period and unresolved inconsistencies, made appeal dispositive without reaching other grounds.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1AFilm, music, performing artsApr 2023Dismissed
Chef beneficiary seeking O-1A nonimmigrant classification for extraordinary ability. Did not receive significant awards, did not demonstrate lead or starring role in distinguished productions, lacked published recognition, and did not show high salary relative to field. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1AFilm, music, performing artsFeb 2023Dismissed
Dismissed · 3 criteria reviewed0 of 3 criteria metRead → - O-1AEducation and academiaJan 2023Dismissed
Education counseling business petitioned for school and career counselor beneficiary's O-1A classification. Petitioner claimed seven criteria; director and AAO found none met. Letters lacked evidence of major field significance. Salary was average, not elevated. Appeal dismissed without final merits determination.
0 of 8 criteria metRead →
