Published AAO appeal decisions

Electrical engineer sought EB-2 NIW. AAO withdrew SCOPS denial and remanded. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research and that he is well positioned to advance it through education, experience, and expert support. SCOPS must reconsider whether balancing factors favor waiving job offer requirement.

A researcher with a master's degree in electrical engineering sought EB-2 NIW for research in wireless charging technology for smartphones. The AAO confirmed the advanced degree requirement and substantial merit but rejected the petition because uncorroborated expert assertions about national importance were insufficient; the technology's impact was limited to employer, licensees, and customers, not national impact.

Technology company petitioned for embedded systems architect with advanced degree; sought NIW for EB-2. AAO sustained appeal, finding proposed endeavor in motor controls and EV charging has national importance, beneficiary well-positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits the US based on track record and critical STEM contributions.

Electrical engineering researcher employed in semiconductor development sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed three Dhanasar prongs. AAO sustained appeal, finding proposed next-generation semiconductor research has national importance, petitioner is well-positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits U.S. interests.

Research associate in electrical and computer engineering conducting NSF-funded research on miniaturized robots for cardiovascular treatment and underwater systems. AAO sustained appeal, finding he satisfied all three Dhanasar prongs: national importance established, well positioned via publications and grants, and contributions sufficiently valuable to benefit the United States.

Metallurgist with advanced degree employed as research engineer sought national interest waiver of job offer requirement for EB-2 classification. AAO found proposed 3D printing research has substantial merit and national importance, and petitioner well positioned to advance it. However, petitioner failed to demonstrate that waiver would benefit United States on balance; dismissed.