AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
4 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipMay 2026Dismissed
Chief operating officer of NSF-funded fire suppression technology startup seeking EB-2 NIW. Qualified for underlying EB-2. AAO affirmed denial of first Dhanasar prong: while fire suppression field is important, petitioner's specific operational work lacks national importance beyond employer benefits and does not broadly impact the industry.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipDec 2025Dismissed
Product engineer with MBA sought EB-2 national interest waiver for electric vehicle consulting business. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar; articles about EV industry and government policy did not establish petitioner's specific endeavor would sufficiently impact the market or economy. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipApr 2025Dismissed
A product development manager and entrepreneur with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. Abandoned initial proposed endeavor after RFE and presented alternative without sufficient development. AAO held inconsistent endeavor presentation prevented meaningful Dhanasar analysis and failed first prong requiring substantial merit and national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipAug 2024Dismissed
An entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW for event promotion business operations. Under Dhanasar, the AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; general industry significance and vague claims of job creation without specific economic impact projections were insufficient. The appeal was dismissed without addressing positioning or balancing prongs.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
