Published AAO appeal decisions

Advanced degree professional in community economic development sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO held while endeavor had substantial merit, petitioner failed to establish national importance through sufficient evidence of prospective impact, relying improperly on industry importance alone rather than specific proposed endeavor impact.

Logistics analyst employer-sponsored petitioner sought EB-2 NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal finding petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 qualification; foreign education credentials not established as equivalent to U.S. advanced degree and insufficient progressive experience documented.

Aviation supply chain manager sought EB-2 NIW classification. The beneficiary claimed four exceptional ability criteria but met only one of six required regulatory criteria. The AAO rejected salary and professional association memberships as inadequately documented, finding the beneficiary ineligible for the underlying classification and thus declining to address the waiver prongs.

Supply chain manager with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal because endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact limited to employing company and clients, without demonstrated broader industry or field implications.

Port manager with advanced degree sought national interest waiver of job offer requirement. AAO agreed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance. Petitioner failed to establish specific work would impact field, industry, or economy beyond company operations. Remaining Dhanasar prongs reserved.

Treasurer/controller in construction industry sought EB-2 NIW for beneficiary proposing civil engineering and residential development company. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance; economic benefits limited to local region without sufficient prospective national impact or implications.

Occupational health and safety consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; evidence showed only general industry significance and vague vision statements without concrete training programs or detailed implementation. Petitioner not well positioned to advance endeavor. Appeal dismissed.

A business executive sought O-1A classification through a technology company petitioner. On appeal the petitioner claimed three of eight criteria: published material, original contributions and critical capacity. The AAO dismissed the appeal because none was established, so the initial evidentiary requirement failed and the final merits were reserved.

An employer petitioned on behalf of a top executive for extraordinary ability classification. The AAO withdrew the service center's previous findings on two criteria: membership and high salary. With fewer than three criteria met, the threshold initial evidence requirement failed. The AAO declined to reach final merits. Appeal dismissed.

University-sponsored global engagement coordinator claiming extraordinary ability. Petitioner established two of eight alternate criteria: judging and scholarly articles. Failed to demonstrate three required criteria under published material and original contributions standards. Decision not reached on final merits assessment.

Restaurant company seeking to employ beneficiary to lead expansion across United States. Claimed expansion creates thousands of jobs in economically distressed areas and promotes cultural exchange. AAO held specific endeavor lacks national importance; job projections unsubstantiated; 19 jobs per location insufficient; market demand unproven.

Humanitarian nonprofit petitions for HR manager beneficiary for EB-2 with NIW. Beneficiary holds advanced degree and employer established EB-2 eligibility. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance to satisfy first Dhanasar prong.

Business operations specialist sought EB-2 NIW classification. Service center denied underlying EB-2 qualification and NIW eligibility. AAO dismissed appeal, focusing on first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it shows no significant potential to employ U.S. workers, no substantial positive economic effects, and anticipated financial loss.

Technology company petitioned for senior director in customer experience as EB-1A extraordinary ability. Employer established at least three evidentiary criteria, but AAO found limited, recent evidence does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among small percentage at top of field; appeal dismissed.

Associate director in international supply chain operations seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Service center found advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed, holding that supply chain management work, despite general field importance, does not demonstrate specific national importance under Dhanasar first prong.

General manager seeking EB-2 NIW for business consulting services claimed company importance to U.S. business ecosystem. AAO dismissed, finding no sufficient evidence that proposed endeavor would impact business consulting field broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects at national level.

A marketing director for a luxury resort wear company sought extraordinary ability classification through employer petition. Claimant submitted five criteria but failed three regarding awards, publications, and critical role. AAO declined final merits review after finding insufficient initial evidence threshold satisfaction.

Regional logistics manager employed by yard management services provider sought national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding broad claims about strategic leadership and industry impact insufficient; specific endeavor showed no prospective national economic benefit or U.S. job creation.

Sales division manager and technical advisor sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver under Dhanasar framework. AAO issued notice of intent to dismiss and instructed response within thirty-three days. Petitioner failed to respond within required timeframe; appeal dismissed as abandoned.

An automotive quality manager sought EB-2 NIW classification. Although the Director found substantial merit and that the petitioner was well-positioned to advance automotive quality improvements, the AAO affirmed dismissal, finding insufficient evidence of national importance beyond general industry benefits.

A swimming pool company executive with a master's degree in linguistic sciences sought EB-2 NIW classification. The petitioner's proposed endeavor was operating a swimming pool company. The AAO affirmed that work benefiting a single employer and its clients lacks national importance without demonstrating broader field implications or substantial economic effects.

Logistics management consultant seeking EB-2 NIW for supply chain and trade consulting work. AAO dismissed appeal; petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance despite claims about supply chain resilience and Brazil trade relations, as projections showed only 15 employees versus industry baseline of 13.3 million.

An employer petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for a strategic project manager. The AAO found the petitioner was not qualified as an advanced degree professional due to insufficient undergraduate credentials, and the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond the specific business and its clients. Appeal dismissed.

Advanced degree professional seeks NIW for business endeavor supporting small and medium-sized enterprises. Claimed alignment with U.S. government initiatives and economic benefits would establish national importance. AAO found vague assertions without specific details or probative evidence of broader industry impact; merely working in important field insufficient without demonstrating specific endeavor's national importance.

Health and safety specialist sought EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW based on proposed safety app development. Service Center found exceptional ability met three criteria but no degree of expertise significantly above field. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance: app benefits only petitioner's employer and clients, not broader industry or public; field importance does not equal endeavor importance.