Published AAO appeal decisions

Advanced degree professional in community economic development sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO held while endeavor had substantial merit, petitioner failed to establish national importance through sufficient evidence of prospective impact, relying improperly on industry importance alone rather than specific proposed endeavor impact.

Logistics analyst employer-sponsored petitioner sought EB-2 NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal finding petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 qualification; foreign education credentials not established as equivalent to U.S. advanced degree and insufficient progressive experience documented.

Aviation supply chain manager sought EB-2 NIW classification. The beneficiary claimed four exceptional ability criteria but met only one of six required regulatory criteria. The AAO rejected salary and professional association memberships as inadequately documented, finding the beneficiary ineligible for the underlying classification and thus declining to address the waiver prongs.

Supply chain manager with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal because endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact limited to employing company and clients, without demonstrated broader industry or field implications.

Port manager with advanced degree sought national interest waiver of job offer requirement. AAO agreed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance. Petitioner failed to establish specific work would impact field, industry, or economy beyond company operations. Remaining Dhanasar prongs reserved.

Treasurer/controller in construction industry sought EB-2 NIW for beneficiary proposing civil engineering and residential development company. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance; economic benefits limited to local region without sufficient prospective national impact or implications.

Occupational health and safety consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; evidence showed only general industry significance and vague vision statements without concrete training programs or detailed implementation. Petitioner not well positioned to advance endeavor. Appeal dismissed.

A business executive sought O-1A classification through a technology company petitioner. On appeal the petitioner claimed three of eight criteria: published material, original contributions and critical capacity. The AAO dismissed the appeal because none was established, so the initial evidentiary requirement failed and the final merits were reserved.

An employer petitioned on behalf of a top executive for extraordinary ability classification. The AAO withdrew the service center's previous findings on two criteria: membership and high salary. With fewer than three criteria met, the threshold initial evidence requirement failed. The AAO declined to reach final merits. Appeal dismissed.

University-sponsored global engagement coordinator claiming extraordinary ability. Petitioner established two of eight alternate criteria: judging and scholarly articles. Failed to demonstrate three required criteria under published material and original contributions standards. Decision not reached on final merits assessment.

Restaurant company seeking to employ beneficiary to lead expansion across United States. Claimed expansion creates thousands of jobs in economically distressed areas and promotes cultural exchange. AAO held specific endeavor lacks national importance; job projections unsubstantiated; 19 jobs per location insufficient; market demand unproven.

Humanitarian nonprofit petitions for HR manager beneficiary for EB-2 with NIW. Beneficiary holds advanced degree and employer established EB-2 eligibility. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance to satisfy first Dhanasar prong.

Business operations specialist sought EB-2 NIW classification. Service center denied underlying EB-2 qualification and NIW eligibility. AAO dismissed appeal, focusing on first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it shows no significant potential to employ U.S. workers, no substantial positive economic effects, and anticipated financial loss.

Technology company petitioned for senior director in customer experience as EB-1A extraordinary ability. Employer established at least three evidentiary criteria, but AAO found limited, recent evidence does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among small percentage at top of field; appeal dismissed.

A business administrator sought EB-2 classification as advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability, plus NIW. SCOPS denied both. The AAO remanded, finding SCOPS misrepresented the record, confused two separate petitions, and did not provide meaningful opportunity to contest. No opinion on ultimate merits.