Published AAO appeal decisions

Health technology company petitions for beneficiary as EB-1A extraordinary ability individual. Beneficiary met six of eight claimed evidentiary criteria, but AAO affirmed denial, finding evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of technology entrepreneurship field.

An employer petitioned for a technology entrepreneur seeking extraordinary ability (EB-1A). Claimed seven criteria initially; director found two met (judging, leading role). On appeal, petitioner claimed five others. AAO found awards and membership unmet and declined to analyze remaining criteria, reserving final merits because threshold initial evidence requirements not satisfied.

Chief operating officer of NSF-funded fire suppression technology startup seeking EB-2 NIW. Qualified for underlying EB-2. AAO affirmed denial of first Dhanasar prong: while fire suppression field is important, petitioner's specific operational work lacks national importance beyond employer benefits and does not broadly impact the industry.

Product engineer with MBA sought EB-2 national interest waiver for electric vehicle consulting business. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar; articles about EV industry and government policy did not establish petitioner's specific endeavor would sufficiently impact the market or economy. Appeal dismissed.

Technology company petitioning for cofounder and CEO claiming extraordinary ability in technology entrepreneurship. Required three of eight criteria; met only one. AAO held venture funding, Forbes membership, and website articles insufficient under O-1A requirements.

A product development manager and entrepreneur with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. Abandoned initial proposed endeavor after RFE and presented alternative without sufficient development. AAO held inconsistent endeavor presentation prevented meaningful Dhanasar analysis and failed first prong requiring substantial merit and national importance.

An entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW for event promotion business operations. Under Dhanasar, the AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; general industry significance and vague claims of job creation without specific economic impact projections were insufficient. The appeal was dismissed without addressing positioning or balancing prongs.

E-commerce gourmet meal delivery CEO sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Employer-petitioner showed beneficiary met published materials and leading role criteria. AAO dismissed because only two criteria met and no major award, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.