Published AAO appeal decisions

A finance and insurance manager with an advanced degree sought NIW. The AAO confirmed EB-2 eligibility but dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor of process improvement and financial management for multiple companies lacked the national importance required under the first Dhanasar prong; projections for job creation and revenue were insufficient.

A compliance manager seeks an EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to adequately define the specific proposed endeavor or demonstrate national importance; generic business activities lack sufficient economic scale for national significance.

Financial manager with foreign bachelor's degree in administration sought EB-2 with NIW. Petitioner claimed five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience as billing analyst. AAO found only four years six months documented, insufficient for EB-2 advanced degree professional eligibility, so dismissed appeal without reaching NIW prongs.

Accountant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for business consulting system for small businesses. AAO held first prong failed: proposed endeavor lacked national importance as general information about small business recovery did not establish specific prospective impact on field or nation; speculation insufficient.

Accounting and financial services company sponsored beneficiary for NIW as advanced degree professional. Claimed national importance through accounting and tax preparation services. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because proposed work would not extend beyond company clientele to impact field or economy at national level.

Financial manager seeking EB-2 with NIW for business consulting platform. Qualified for EB-2 advanced degree category. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; benefits do not extend beyond employer and clients to impact field or national economy.

Entrepreneur in financial consulting holding advanced degree applied for EB-2 with NIW under Dhanasar framework. Director found substantial merit but denied national importance; AAO affirmed. Petitioner's consulting business lacked evidence of specific endeavor having prospective impact beyond own clients and employees.

A financial manager sought EB-2 NIW classification proposing to advance financial management services for U.S. businesses. The AAO rejected the claim that the proposed endeavor had national importance, finding the applicant provided insufficient evidence of specific impact, scope, viability, or economic benefit. Appeal dismissed.

A personal financial advisor sought EB-2 with national interest waiver under Dhanasar framework. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner failed to establish substantial merit and national importance of the proposed endeavor, offering only generalized assertions about attracting investment and supporting clients without showing broader field or national impact.

Attorney and international tax consultant with advanced degree seeking EB-2 NIW for self-employment in tax consulting. Met underlying advanced degree classification but failed first Dhanasar prong because specific endeavor lacked national importance. Creating eight jobs and tax revenue insufficient to establish substantial prospective impact warranting waiver.

Financial analyst with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. Petitioner proposed real estate financial advisory work but failed to establish national importance under Dhanasar first prong. AAO found proposed endeavor lacks sufficient prospective impact beyond employer and clientele to warrant waiver.

A finance consultant with advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW. The petitioner proposed operating a financial consulting company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor lacks national importance and substantial positive economic effects required under Dhanasar.

Financial analyst from Brazil seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Proposed endeavor was general financial services work and later starting a consulting business with projected five-year revenue of six hundred thousand dollars. AAO rejected first prong of Dhanasar test; work lacks sufficient prospective impact on U.S. economy or broader financial services industry. Appeal dismissed.

Financial analyst seeking national interest waiver. Director found substantial merit but denied on national importance grounds. AAO affirmed; petitioner relied on prior accomplishments rather than demonstrating proposed work would impact industry broadly or create substantial U.S. economic effects.

Financial manager seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Proposed work involves financial management for private security company. Failed first Dhanasar prong: insufficient evidence that proposed financial management work has national importance, broader field implications, significant job creation potential, or substantial positive economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

An oil and gas investment portfolio director claimed six extraordinary ability criteria. The AAO found three criteria met: scholarly articles, leading role, and high salary. However, at final merits the decision held the publication record was too recent and lacked citation evidence of sustained acclaim to establish extraordinary ability.

A quantitative analyst and vice president at a financial firm sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner met only leading role and high salary criteria, but failed on scholarly articles lacking major publication venues and original contributions lacking field-wide impact.

Software development executive in financial technology claimed extraordinary ability via membership, original contributions, critical role, and salary. AAO found only critical role criterion met, disagreed with director on salary, rejected membership and contributions as insufficient. Dismissed for failing three-criterion threshold.

A financial specialist seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for facilitating Eastern European investment in U.S. real estate. Qualifies as advanced degree holder but fails NIW first prong; proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance, showing insufficient economic impact beyond company operations.

A financial manager sought an EB-2 national interest waiver to work for U.S. companies on restructuring and foreign investment attraction. The AAO dismissed because her proposed endeavor lacked national importance; it would only benefit her employer and clients, not the financial services industry or broader economy.

Real estate professional claimed extraordinary ability based on innovative underwriting methodology and other criteria. AAO affirmed that judging criterion was met but rejected the original contributions claim because the beneficiary's involvement was insufficiently significant and showed no major field impact. Appeal dismissed.

An employer petitioned for an EB-1A visa for a Chief Financial and Risk Officer in international corporate finance and strategic business development. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the beneficiary's achievements, though notable, did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

The beneficiary is a business executive in the investment field, for whom a petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification in business or education. The lesser-awards criterion, based on company rankings in trade articles, was analyzed and rejected. The AAO dismissed the appeal because sustained national or international acclaim was not shown.

A nonprofit research foundation sponsored a policy analyst as extraordinarily able in economics. The AAO rejected student scholarships, professional memberships, media appearances as published material, and judging roles as insufficient. Aggregate evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top-level achievement.

A law office sought to employ an accountant as an H-1B specialty occupation worker, not O-1A. The director denied the petition. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the position resembled a bookkeeping or accounting clerk role that does not require a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, and no specialty occupation criterion was satisfied.