Published AAO appeal decisions

An airline pilot first officer/captain sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding that evidence of pilot shortages and aviation industry importance did not establish that the petitioner's specific endeavor as a commercial pilot had national importance or broader implications.

International youth hockey program sought O-1A visa for head coach. Beneficiary met only one of eight evidentiary criteria (high salary). AAO dismissed appeal finding petitioner failed to demonstrate three required criteria and thus could not reach totality evaluation of extraordinary ability in athletics.

Commercial pilot with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. The AAO found his proposed endeavor—employment as pilot and instructor—lacked national importance because he did not identify specific impact on aviation field beyond customers and employers. General pilot shortages do not establish national interest.

Fitness company petitioned for bodybuilder beneficiary as O-1A extraordinary ability. Director denied on contract sufficiency and failure to meet three of eight criteria. AAO dismissed appeal, finding serious errors and discrepancies in employment contract, including two contracts for same period and unresolved inconsistencies, made appeal dispositive without reaching other grounds.

Youth soccer academy petitioned to employ a soccer coach as an EB-2 beneficiary with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial because the coach's youth coaching endeavor lacked national importance; recommendations showed coaching excellence but not prospective impact at industry scale required by Dhanasar.

A sports management company petitioned for a sumo wrestler seeking O-1A extraordinary ability. The applicant met only the awards criterion. Claims of membership in elite associations and published media coverage failed because the federation membership lacked documented outstanding achievement requirements and articles lacked proper attribution. Fewer than three criteria were satisfied so appeal was dismissed.

Employer petitioned for basketball player for O-1A classification. Petition failed on contract documentation, event description, and evidentiary criteria requirements. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner waived contest of contract and event grounds and AAO declined to reach the evidentiary criterion argument.

A martial arts academy sought O-1A extension for an MMA athletic trainer. The AAO remanded, finding the director erred in concluding the RFE response lacked supporting documentation; FedEx tracking and copies of submitted exhibits proved delivery of a three-pound package, warranting reconsideration of substantive eligibility criteria.